While The Stranger is a great, thought provoking book that is a
fantastic door to begin looking at existentialistic thought and concepts, it
was not what stood out the most to me during our class. I have been in many
settings where you have a large group of people all trying to engage on one
topic, and most of the time that goes well for a short while before people
begin to wander and break the atmosphere. This reminded me more of a music
clinic, where you have a large group of musicians coming together in a small
room where the only “disturbance” is a well stated and respectful disagreement
arises on the best approach to master a technique. Where so much of the group
is engaged and curious how one thought may lead off the next or how someone
will react when their view is challenged with a question; how someone
questioning someone else’s view that you thought had no connection to your own
suddenly breaks that notion by making you question your own. Where it is a
collective thought as opposed to a forum for one to wait until they have their
turn to speak.
I think what makes this scenario so interesting and refreshing is that
it can really only come when people begin to let go of their ego. To allow
empathetic concepts to take over to a degree, or as completely as perceivably
possible. For this to be our first true class, and so many people that are new
to the concepts, many even new to “adulthood” or being on their own, and to be
able to fill almost 3 hours with over one hundred people with a very engaged,
interested and positive atmosphere with a lot of great input, it made me very
happy to be a part of the class. I am still quite surprised at just how many
people volunteered the input right from the beginning and how it grew even more
by the end of the class. That has definitely never been the typical situation I
have found. There were many strong opinions of the content, which often leads
to a sorting of the herd, where only the loudest and most forceful are left
standing or even interested at the end. When that wasn’t the case, and people
willingly took a back seat to listen to other views and give a moment to
actually consider those views as well. For that to happen even when there were
disagreements about a concept or theory, and a couple “baby” closers thrown out
there, was nice.
However, if I had to point out a specific time when I thought the veil was about to be pulled and Gamera would be the blushing bride to bring this party to its end, I would have to say the path of evolution. In these discussions, I have known three almost instant killers of atmosphere, respect and continued interest: politics, evolution and religion. After it continued to travel the route of disagreement beyond its initially intended point and became a matter of facts and literal meaning denouncing the traction of the point (whether valid or not), some of the wind began to leave my sails. That was certainly not the case on this voyage though, reason prevailed and the discussion was able to find a medium that at least left that yard and got back to other ways to express the intent so the group could understand collectively (though not in full agreement, obviously) and continue the questions and analysis.
However, if I had to point out a specific time when I thought the veil was about to be pulled and Gamera would be the blushing bride to bring this party to its end, I would have to say the path of evolution. In these discussions, I have known three almost instant killers of atmosphere, respect and continued interest: politics, evolution and religion. After it continued to travel the route of disagreement beyond its initially intended point and became a matter of facts and literal meaning denouncing the traction of the point (whether valid or not), some of the wind began to leave my sails. That was certainly not the case on this voyage though, reason prevailed and the discussion was able to find a medium that at least left that yard and got back to other ways to express the intent so the group could understand collectively (though not in full agreement, obviously) and continue the questions and analysis.
For all of these things, I would really just like to thank the class
for apparently being in this class to broaden your views and have a genuine
interest in the concepts presented. For being willing to throw your views out
there, even if it was just a start and your weren’t entirely sure where to go once
you started but still spoke up and continued to so you could find the places
that worked for your present mentality. I
really hope this is a true precursor to the rest of our semester together. I
apologize if this is not easy to build off of exactly, however, this is what
has stuck with me over the last two days and more than anything is what I took
from the class. Are there any others in the same boat as I am in? Anyone who
maybe disagrees and felt a greater detachment from “the group” instead?
No comments:
Post a Comment